Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Taxes should be based on how much society helps you; since wealth is the best way to see that help, we should tax people based on their yearly salary.

Conclusion: Taxation for every individual should be based exclusively on their income.

Reasoning: A fair tax system matches contributions to the benefits received from society, and wealth is the most objective measure of those benefits.

Analysis: The philosopher commits a 'equivocation' or 'concept shift' flaw. The premises establish a rule based on 'wealth' (total accumulated assets), but the conclusion suddenly switches to 'income' (money earned over a specific period). These are not the same thing. To find the parallel, look for an argument that establishes a premise about one category and then draws a conclusion about a related, but distinctly different, category.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

25.

The flawed reasoning in the political philosopher's argument is most similar to that in which one of the following?

Correct Answer
A
It matches the flawed shift in metric. The premise sets tax ∝ danger and picks top speed as the best measure of danger, but the conclusion taxes in proportion to acceleration, not top speed. That mirrors wealth vs. income in the stimulus.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep