WeakenDiff: Hard

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Companies that party a lot tend to make more money, so EZ Corp thinks throwing more parties will make them more money too.

Conclusion: The EZ Corporation can increase its profitability by scheduling more staff parties during work hours.

Reasoning: Data shows that, on average, companies that have frequent social events are more profitable than those that do not.

Analysis: This argument makes a classic leap from correlation to causation. Just because profitable companies have parties doesn't mean the parties are the reason they are rich; it’s just as likely that they have parties because they can already afford them. To weaken this, look for an answer that suggests the causal arrow points the other way, or one that points out that having parties *during business hours* might actually hurt productivity and profits. A little office fun is great, but not if it stops the actual work from getting done!

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

25.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the argument above?

Correct Answer
A
It provides a reverse-causation explanation: many companies hold frequent workplace social events because they already have above-average profits. If profits → more events (rather than events → profits), then the recommendation that EZ can raise profits by adding parties is undermined.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep