Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: New chess players try to figure out what will happen next, while experienced players just remember what worked in similar situations before.

Reasoning: Beginners calculate the future consequences of moves, whereas experts rely on recognizing patterns from similar positions they have encountered in the past.

Analysis: This stimulus sets up a contrast between two different cognitive approaches to the same task. Since the expert's success is tied to 'having been in a similar position before,' their advantage is heavily dependent on a library of stored experiences. You should look for an answer that draws a logical inference from this dependency—for instance, that an expert might struggle more than expected if faced with a completely random or unprecedented board state. Essentially, the expert is playing a game of 'memory' while the beginner is playing a game of 'what if.'

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

6.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?

Correct Answer
D
Expert decision-making is said to be made by recognizing prior positions and using recalled information about prior consequences. That directly supports that an expert relies crucially on memory.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep