WeakenDiff: Hardest

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Bears love a specific forest where the road has been shut down for years, and their numbers there have spiked, so keeping that road closed will make the whole valley's bear population grow.

Conclusion: Keeping the main road through the Kiffer Forest Preserve closed will lead to an increase in the total bear population of the valley.

Reasoning: Since the road was closed eight years ago, the number of bears living in that specific preserve has nearly doubled.

Analysis: The argument suffers from a classic 'part-to-whole' flaw. Just because the bear population in one specific preserve increased doesn't mean the population of the entire valley increased; the bears might have simply moved from other parts of the valley into the quieter preserve. To weaken this, look for an answer that suggests the total number of bears stayed the same while they just shifted their 'zip code' to avoid traffic. If the preserve's gain was just the rest of the valley's loss, the conclusion falls apart.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

24.

Which one of the following, if true, most undermines the argument?

Correct Answer
E
E directly undercuts the conclusion by stating the valley’s total bear population has remained about the same over the relevant period, even though the preserve’s population doubled. That shows the subset increase does not imply overall increase.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep