WeakenDiff: Hard

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Since the stuff that causes acid rain is being pumped into the air less often than it used to be, the environment should start seeing less damage from acid rain.

Conclusion: The negative environmental impacts of acid rain are expected to decline globally.

Reasoning: Acid rain is caused by acidic pollutants, and the total amount of these pollutants released into the atmosphere has been dropping for several decades.

Analysis: The columnist assumes a direct, proportional relationship between the amount of pollutants and the severity of environmental damage. To weaken this, we could suggest that the remaining pollutants are more concentrated, or that the environment has reached a tipping point where even less acid causes more harm. Since this is an 'EXCEPT' question, four choices will undermine this link, and the correct one will either support it or be irrelevant. Keep an eye out for factors that could keep acid rain damage high despite lower emissions.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

24.

Each of the following, if true, would weaken the columnist's argument EXCEPT:

Correct Answer
A
If some ecosystems have mechanisms that reduce the negative effects of increased acidity, that does not undercut—and can even support—the expectation of reduced harm when emissions decline. It’s the one option that doesn’t weaken the argument.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep