WeakenDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Researchers tracked two groups of sick people for ten years—one group went to support meetings and the other didn't. Since almost everyone in both groups died by the end, the researchers decided the meetings don't help people live longer.

Conclusion: Attending support group meetings does not extend the lifespan of patients with disease T.

Reasoning: In a study of two equal groups, nearly the same number of patients died after ten years regardless of whether they attended support meetings.

Analysis: The argument assumes that because the death toll was the same at the ten-year mark, the timing of those deaths was also the same. To weaken this, we should look for evidence that the support group members lived longer within those ten years. For example, if the non-support group died in year two while the support group died in year nine, the meetings definitely helped them live longer.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

25.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

Correct Answer
C
It directly shows that the support‑group patients lived 2 years longer on average. That undercuts the author’s inference from equal 10‑year death counts to no longevity benefit and explains how both groups can have 41 deaths by year 10 while one group still lives longer.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep