Passage Summary: Because we don't allow experts to be on juries for cases they actually understand, the jury system is an unfair way to settle those technical disputes.

Conclusion: Jury trials are not a fair way to resolve legal disputes involving specialized scientific or technical issues.

Reasoning: The legal system systematically excludes people with expert knowledge of the relevant technical issues from serving on the juries for those cases.

Analysis: The author assumes that 'fairness' is dependent on having technical experts in the jury box. However, the legal definition of a fair trial often centers on having an impartial, unbiased group of peers who can weigh evidence presented by experts, rather than being experts themselves. To weaken this, we should look for a reason why excluding experts might actually preserve fairness—perhaps experts would be too biased or would exert undue influence over other jurors. Look for an answer that suggests non-experts are capable of making fair decisions or that including experts would introduce new problems. It turns out that sometimes, knowing too much can be its own kind of baggage.