Passage Summary: News reports focus heavily on rare dangers while ignoring common ones unless they're weird; because people judge danger by what's on the news, their sense of risk is likely distorted.

Reasoning: Media outlets only report common threats when they are unusual, but they report rare threats universally. People judge risk based on how often they see threats in the media.

Analysis: This stimulus sets up a relationship between media behavior and human psychology. If the media over-represents rare events and under-represents common ones, and people base their risk assessments on media frequency, a logical inference is that people's risk assessments will be inaccurate. Specifically, look for an answer that suggests people will perceive rare threats as more common than they actually are, or common threats as less frequent than they are. It’s a classic look at how 'availability bias' is fueled by news cycles.