Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Some people say you shouldn't criticize others for being critical, but that's not quite right. While we all judge each other, the real problem is being 'judgmental,' which means judging someone before you actually try to understand them.

Conclusion: The idea that it is nonsensical to criticize someone for being critical is likely incorrect.

Reasoning: While people naturally must evaluate one another, there is a valid distinction between necessary assessment and being 'judgmental,' which involves judging someone before attempting to understand them.

Analysis: The first sentence sets up the target: the idea that criticizing critics is absurd. The author immediately dismisses this claim as having 'little plausibility.' The rest of the passage provides the nuance—distinguishing between necessary assessment and unfair 'judgmentalism'—to support that initial rejection. When looking for the conclusion, focus on that opening sentence's stance, as the rest of the text serves to explain why the author holds that position.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

18.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion drawn in the argument?

Correct Answer
E
E captures the author’s main point after the pivot: that the injunction against being judgmental is wise.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep