Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Australia has plenty of meat-eating reptiles but very few meat-eating mammals, probably because mammals need to eat way more and Australia's environment doesn't offer much food.

Conclusion: The lack of food in Australian ecosystems is the likely reason why there are so few species of carnivorous mammals compared to reptiles.

Reasoning: Mammals have higher caloric requirements than reptiles, making it harder for them to survive in environments where food is not abundant.

Analysis: The phrase 'This is probably a consequence of' is a major clue that the author is offering an explanation for the observed phenomenon. The rest of the passage provides the biological 'why' regarding metabolic differences to support that explanation. Focus strictly on the sentence that identifies the cause of the disparity between mammal and reptile species counts.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

11.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?

Correct Answer
C
C states the main conclusion: that the unusual sparseness of Australia’s ecosystems is probably the reason for the observed disparity in carnivorous mammal versus reptile species counts.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep