Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Scientists love to prove people wrong because it makes them famous, and many are trying to debunk global warming, but almost none of them are actually finding evidence that it's not happening.

Reasoning: Scientists are incentivized to challenge status quos, yet very few have successfully found evidence against the prevailing theory of global warming despite widespread efforts.

Analysis: In a 'Most Strongly Supported' question, we must treat the premises as facts and see what they collectively imply. We are told that scientists are actively trying to overthrow conventional wisdom for the sake of recognition, yet despite hundreds of researchers looking for evidence that global warming is unlikely, they are coming up empty-handed. This suggests that the evidence supporting global warming is likely very strong, as it has resisted numerous attempts at debunking by motivated professionals. Look for an answer that synthesizes these facts into a statement about the strength of the current climatological consensus.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

18.

The information above provides the most support for which one of the following statements?

Correct Answer
B
Given that nothing brings more recognition than overturning conventional wisdom and that hundreds are striving for breakthroughs in climatology, it follows that most climatology researchers have substantial motive to find disconfirming evidence about global warming.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep