Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A study showed that people taking garlic pills had much better heart-health numbers than people taking sugar pills, so garlic must be good for your heart.

Conclusion: Consuming garlic is an effective way to lower blood fats and decrease the risk of heart disease.

Reasoning: In a four-month study, patients taking garlic saw significantly higher drops in cholesterol and triglycerides compared to a control group taking a fake pill.

Analysis: To evaluate this study, we need to know if the two groups were truly comparable. If the garlic group happened to be on a better diet or exercise regimen by coincidence, the garlic might not be the cause of the improvement. A good tutor would tell you to look for an answer that probes for 'confounding variables' or differences between the groups that weren't controlled for. We need to ensure that the only significant difference between the two groups was the garlic itself.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

2.

It would be most important to determine which one of the following in evaluating the argument?

Correct Answer
B
B targets the most critical potential confound. Differences in diet could fully account for the lipid changes, so knowing the groups’ diets is crucial to evaluating the argument’s causal claim.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep