Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Since everything dies eventually, the author argues we shouldn't bother trying to keep things alive right now.

Conclusion: Efforts to protect currently endangered species are not justified.

Reasoning: Because all species will eventually go extinct anyway, there is no point in trying to save them in the short term.

Analysis: The flaw here is a classic case of nihilistic logic: the author assumes that because a long-term outcome is inevitable, short-term intervention is worthless. It's like saying you shouldn't bother fixing a leak in your roof because the house will eventually be demolished in a hundred years. To find the parallel, look for an argument that rejects a beneficial action simply because it cannot prevent an ultimate, unavoidable conclusion. It's a bit like refusing to eat because you'll just be hungry again later—a very grumpy way to live!

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

12.

The reasoning in the argument above is most closely paralleled by the argument that there is no reason to

Correct Answer
B
B matches the flawed pattern: no reason to spend on preventive maintenance because the car won’t last indefinitely. Like the stimulus, it mistakes eventual failure for a reason not to take present action that could meaningfully delay or reduce harm.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep