WeakenDiff: Easy

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Even though we are trying harder to save habitats, more animals are going extinct, so the author thinks the effort is pointless.

Conclusion: Efforts to protect the natural habitats of endangered species are a waste of time and resources.

Reasoning: Despite the increase in international conservation efforts, the rate of species extinction is still going up rather than down.

Analysis: To weaken this argument, we need to find a reason why the efforts might not be wasted even if extinction rates are rising. Perhaps the extinction rate would be significantly higher if these habitat protections weren't in place. Look for an answer that suggests the situation would be even worse without the current efforts, showing they are actually having a positive, albeit insufficient, impact.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

2.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?

Correct Answer
B
B shows that the efforts have saved species that would otherwise be extinct. If true, the efforts are not “wasted,” directly weakening the conclusion.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep