Passage Summary: Because of a strange childhood, Robin doesn't understand 'right vs. wrong,' only 'legal vs. illegal,' so when Robin broke the law, they knew it was a crime but didn't think it was 'bad' in a moral sense.

Reasoning: Robin's upbringing left them unable to distinguish morality, meaning they only understand the world through the lens of the law.

Analysis: We must treat the premises as absolute: Robin literally cannot conceive of moral differences. Therefore, any action Robin takes—even an illegal one—will be processed by Robin solely as a legal matter, not a moral one. The correct answer will likely restate that Robin's knowledge of the law does not imply or provide any knowledge of morality. We are looking for a synthesis that stays strictly within the bounds of Robin's limited conceptual framework without adding outside moral assumptions.