WeakenDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Road salt has caused a significant spike in the saltiness of local water over the last two decades; if this trend continues, the water will soon cross the limit of what people find drinkable.

Conclusion: Continuing to salt the roads at the current rate will make Albritten's groundwater taste bad within a few decades.

Reasoning: Salt levels rose from 10 to 100 milligrams per liter over 20 years, and the threshold for unpalatable taste is 250 milligrams per liter.

Analysis: The argument assumes that the salt concentration will continue to increase at the same rate indefinitely. To weaken this, we need to find a reason why that trend might stop or slow down. For instance, if the groundwater eventually flushes out salt at a certain saturation point, or if the initial jump was due to a specific historical change that won't be repeated, the conclusion is undermined. Look for an answer that suggests the salt level will stabilize below the 250 mg/L threshold.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

6.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

Correct Answer
D
D shows Albritten’s groundwater had ~90 mg/L 20 years ago, before heavy salting. That means the increase since salting began is only about 10 mg/L, undermining the idea that road salting is rapidly pushing levels toward 250 in the next few decades and weakening the projection.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep