Passage Summary: Writers often have secret drafts they hate, but their families might publish them anyway after they die, so the critic says writers should just burn those drafts now.

Conclusion: If a successful writer chooses not to publish a new manuscript, they ought to destroy it right away.

Reasoning: Heirs frequently publish posthumous works without regard for quality, even though writers often have work they consider unworthy of their reputation.

Analysis: The critic assumes that immediate destruction is the only way to prevent unwanted publication. To weaken this, we should look for reasons why a writer might want to keep a manuscript despite not wanting it published right now. Perhaps the writer might change their mind later, or the manuscript could serve as a valuable reference for future work that they actually intend to publish.