Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: The author argues that taking hard math classes will boost your grades simply because the students who take those classes already have high grades.

Conclusion: Enrolling in advanced mathematics classes is expected to result in a higher grade point average for students.

Reasoning: Research indicates a strong correlation where students who take these math courses typically possess higher grade point averages than those who do not.

Analysis: This argument commits a classic 'correlation vs. causation' error. It observes that two things happen together—taking math and having a high GPA—and incorrectly assumes that the math classes are the cause of the high GPA. In reality, it is just as likely that students who are already high achievers are the ones choosing to take advanced math. To find the parallel flaw, look for an answer choice that takes a statistical association and treats it as a causal guarantee.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

22.

The flawed pattern of reasoning in the argument above is most similar to that in which one of the following?

Correct Answer
D
It concludes that buying running shoes should increase exercise frequency because people who buy more shoes exercise more often. This mirrors the flawed move from mere correlation (more shoes ↔ more exercise) to a causal recommendation (“should increase”).
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep