Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Ashley notes that words like 'of' don't point to actual things like 'shirts' do. Joshua agrees, but he takes it a step further by claiming that if a word doesn't point to a thing, it has no meaning at all and we should stop using it.

Reasoning: Ashley claims that certain words do not refer to physical objects; Joshua agrees and concludes that because these words lack reference, they are meaningless and should be discarded.

Analysis: The focus here is on Joshua’s leap in logic. He equates Ashley’s observation about a lack of 'reference' with a total lack of 'meaning.' To Joshua, if a word doesn't point to a physical object, it serves no purpose. Look for an answer choice that captures this specific interpretation—that Joshua believes 'referring to something' is a necessary condition for a word to have meaning.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

15.

Joshua's remarks indicate that he interpreted Ashley's statement to imply that

Correct Answer
A
A captures Joshua’s interpretation: only words that refer to something have meaning. That explains why, upon agreeing the words don’t refer, he immediately calls them meaningless and says they should be abandoned.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep