Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: When history books give different dates for the same event, historians try to weed out the less reliable books and then look for outside clues to figure out which date is actually correct.

Reasoning: Historians face difficulties when sources disagree on dates; they should reduce the number of sources and then attempt to find the correct date using external evidence.

Analysis: Since this is a 'Most Strongly Supported' question, we need to find a statement that follows logically from the provided facts without overreaching. The stimulus notes that even after narrowing down sources, several often remain, and independent verification is only 'occasionally' successful. This suggests that the process of elimination doesn't always result in a single, definitive answer. Look for an answer choice that reflects this inherent uncertainty or the limitations of the historians' methods.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

20.

Which one of the following inferences is most strongly supported by the information above?

Correct Answer
B
The passage explicitly allows that attempts to independently determine the right date are sometimes unsuccessful. Therefore, for some events with conflicting chronologies that historians attempt to resolve, the date cannot be reliably determined.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep