Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Since all the best athletes are about equally strong, the thing that actually separates the winners from the losers is how well they use their technique to manage that strength.

Conclusion: To become a champion, an athlete must possess a superior mastery of athletic techniques.

Reasoning: Strength is a finite resource used efficiently by technique, and since elite athletes are roughly equal in strength, technique becomes the deciding factor.

Analysis: The conclusion is signaled by the transition phrase 'it follows that,' which indicates the author's final point. The argument establishes that because strength is relatively equal among elite competitors, it cannot be the deciding factor for success. Therefore, the author concludes that superior technique is the necessary ingredient for becoming a champion. When identifying the conclusion, always look for the statement that is supported by the other claims rather than supporting them.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

3.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the argument?

Correct Answer
C
It restates the conclusion’s necessity claim: no athlete can be a champion without superior mastery of athletic techniques (champion → superior mastery).
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep