Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Because a painting didn't look much like the person it portrayed, a copy of that painting won't be a good copy of the artwork.

Conclusion: The reproduction of the painting will not be an accurate copy of that painting.

Reasoning: The original painting itself was not an accurate representation of the person it was supposed to depict.

Analysis: This argument is flawed because it confuses the accuracy of the *subject* with the accuracy of the *copy*. A reproduction can be a flawless, 100% accurate replica of a very 'inaccurate' or poorly drawn original painting. To parallel this, look for an answer that concludes a second-stage process (the copy) is a failure simply because the first-stage process (the original) failed to match an external reality. The logic fails to distinguish between the quality of the source material and the quality of the duplication process.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

21.

Which one of the following is most similar in its flawed reasoning to the flawed reasoning in the argument above?

Correct Answer
A
Correct. It mirrors the flaw by conflating content accuracy (half-truths and misquotes) with recording fidelity (sound quality). A tape can be crystal-clear even if the speech’s content is inaccurate.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep