WeakenDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: While we usually think of the five senses as totally separate, some people experience them bleeding into one another, leading researchers to believe their sensory boundaries are blurred.

Conclusion: The experiences of synesthesiacs demonstrate that their senses do not follow the standard boundaries that typically separate the five senses.

Reasoning: Some individuals report sensory overlaps, such as perceiving colors as having smells or tasting a specific color when eating certain foods.

Analysis: To weaken this argument, we need to find a reason why these 'cross-sensory' reports don't actually prove the senses are overlapping. The argument assumes that if someone says they 'taste blue,' it is a literal sensory crossover rather than a psychological association or a linguistic quirk. Look for an answer that suggests these experiences are caused by something other than a breakdown of sensory boundaries, such as a memory-based association or a non-sensory neurological glitch. If the 'blue' taste is just a learned reaction, the 'boundary' between the physical senses might still be perfectly intact.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

12.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

Correct Answer
A
If synesthesiacs have a general, systematic impairment in using and understanding words, their statements like “tasting blue” could reflect linguistic confusion rather than genuine cross-sensory perception, undermining the conclusion that their senses themselves fail to respect boundaries.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep