WeakenDiff: Hardest
Logic Breakdown
Passage Summary: The speaker claims that a tax refund won't boost the economy because the money gained by one group is exactly equal to the money lost by another group due to budget requirements.
Conclusion: The proposed tax refund will fail to produce a net increase in spending for the province's economy.
Reasoning: The $600 million given to taxpayers is perfectly offset by $600 million taken away through new taxes or lost wages for dismissed provincial employees.
Analysis: The argument assumes that a dollar in the hands of a taxpayer has the exact same economic impact as a dollar in the hands of a government worker or the government itself. To weaken this, we need to find a reason why the 'refund' side of the scale might carry more weight than the 'offset' side. For instance, if taxpayers spend their money more rapidly or on different types of goods than the government does, there could still be a net stimulus even if the total dollar amount remains the same. Look for an answer that disrupts the 'zero-sum' assumption.
Conclusion: The proposed tax refund will fail to produce a net increase in spending for the province's economy.
Reasoning: The $600 million given to taxpayers is perfectly offset by $600 million taken away through new taxes or lost wages for dismissed provincial employees.
Analysis: The argument assumes that a dollar in the hands of a taxpayer has the exact same economic impact as a dollar in the hands of a government worker or the government itself. To weaken this, we need to find a reason why the 'refund' side of the scale might carry more weight than the 'offset' side. For instance, if taxpayers spend their money more rapidly or on different types of goods than the government does, there could still be a net stimulus even if the total dollar amount remains the same. Look for an answer that disrupts the 'zero-sum' assumption.
Passage Stimulus
Passage Redacted
Unlock Full Passage24.The conclusion about whether there would be a resulting net increase in spending would not follow if the
Correct Answer
E
E breaks the zero-sum logic. If the province can keep its workers and save $600 million by reducing out-of-province expenditures, the budget still balances, taxpayers still get the refund, and the offset does not remove the same $600 million from in-province spending. That allows a net increase in in-province spending, so the conclusion would not follow.
Upgrade Your Prep
Ready to go beyond free explanations?
LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.
Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal