Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: Bad drivers with lots of tickets need to be punished with either jail or classes, but classes should only be used if they actually help, and they almost never help people who already have a lot of tickets.

Reasoning: Serious offenders with many demerit points must receive jail or re-education; re-education is only appropriate if it works; however, it almost never works for drivers with many points.

Analysis: This stimulus sets up a conditional requirement: punishment is mandatory (jail or re-education), but one of those options (re-education) has a strict prerequisite (it must be likely to work). Since the final premise tells us that re-education is almost never effective for this specific group, the logical path narrows significantly. We should look for an answer that suggests jail is the only remaining viable option for the majority of these specific offenders. It’s a classic process of elimination based on the provided rules.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

12.

If the editorialist's statements are true, they provide the most support for which one of the following?

Correct Answer
A
Given that re-education should be recommended only if it’s likely to make G more responsible, and it’s virtually never likely for such drivers, re-education is off the table. Since G must be punished with either jail or re-education, jail follows.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep