WeakenDiff: Hard

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: In a small country, as more 18-year-olds joined the military, the number of high school dropouts also went up. Because of this, the author thinks the military is mostly focusing on signing up dropouts.

Conclusion: The republic's overall recruitment of 18-year-olds is driven primarily by the recruitment of those who dropped out of high school.

Reasoning: There is a statistical correlation between the increase in the total percentage of 18-year-olds recruited and the increase in the percentage of 18-year-olds who are dropouts.

Analysis: The author observes a correlation and assumes a specific dependency. To weaken this, we need to find an alternative explanation for why both percentages rose or show that the recruitment of graduates actually drove the numbers. Look for an answer choice that suggests the increase in recruitment was actually among high school graduates, even if the dropout rate was also rising independently. It is a classic case of assuming that because two trends move together, one must be the cause of the other.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

11.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

Correct Answer
C
If, between 1980 and 1986, the percentage of high school graduates among 18-year-old recruits rose sharply, then the increase in recruitment is tied more to graduates than to dropouts. That directly undercuts the conclusion that 18-year-old recruitment rates depend substantially on dropout recruitment rates.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep