Must be TrueDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: We should try to make people better, but there is a weird problem: praising good people makes them worse, while praising bad people makes them better, even though bad people don't actually deserve the praise.

Reasoning: We are told to act in ways that increase virtue in others; however, praise increases virtue in the less virtuous while decreasing it in the more virtuous, yet only the more virtuous deserve it.

Analysis: This stimulus presents a moral paradox where our duty to improve others conflicts with our sense of who deserves reward. If we strictly follow the rule to make others more virtuous, we would end up praising those who don't deserve it and withholding praise from those who do. To find the correct inference, look for a statement that combines these rules into a logical consequence. The most likely path is an answer that acknowledges we should sometimes do what is 'undeserved' to achieve the goal of increasing virtue.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

6.

From the statements above, if true, which one of the following can be properly inferred?

Correct Answer
C
C matches the combined principles: praise those who don’t deserve it (the less virtuous) because it makes them more virtuous, and withhold praise from those who do deserve it (the more virtuous) because praising them would make them less virtuous.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep