WeakenDiff: Medium

Logic Breakdown

Passage Summary: A manager thinks business is booming because total sales are up, but an accountant points out that every old location is actually losing customers, suggesting the food is losing its touch.

Conclusion: The overall consumer appeal of the company's meals has declined.

Reasoning: Sales dropped significantly at every single restaurant that was open during both the previous and current years.

Analysis: The accountant is falling into a classic trap by looking only at a subset of data—the 'old' restaurants—and ignoring the impact of new ones. If the company opened several new locations that are absolutely swamped with customers, total desirability could be skyrocketing even if older locations are flagging. To weaken this, we should look for an answer that suggests the sales drop at old locations is due to something other than the food's appeal, such as the company cannibalizing its own market by opening new spots nearby. It is a classic case of 'the parts don't always represent the whole,' especially when the company's footprint is changing.

Passage Stimulus

Passage Redacted

Unlock Full Passage

10.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the accountant's argument?

Correct Answer
E
If most continuing restaurants are in areas where residents’ incomes fell severely, their sales would predictably drop for economic reasons unrelated to the meals’ desirability. This makes the accountant’s generalization from that subset to overall desirability suspect.
Upgrade Your Prep

Ready to go beyond free explanations?

LSAT Perfection is the #1 modern LSAT prep platform, trusted by thousands of students for comprehensive test strategies, advanced drilling, and full analytics on every PrepTest.

Detailed explanations for 59 PrepTests
Advanced drillset builder
Personalized analytics
Built-in Wrong Answer Journal
Explore Perfection Plus for full LSAT prep